Social reformers calling for old age
pensions brought the issue into the national political arena. In the first
decade of the 20th century, the question of what type of relief
(if any) seniors were entitled to was debated repeatedly in the two years
leading up to the passage of the 1908 Government Annuities Act.
In early 1907, two outspoken members of the Senate voiced their views on
the benefits of an annuities program as opposed to a pension system.
Sir Richard Cartwright (1835-1912), from Kingston,
Ontario, was a Liberal Senator and the Minister of Trade and Commerce in
Wilfrid Laurier's government in 1907. He was closely involved in the
development of the Government Annuities bill. Despite his argument in
favour of pensions for "deserving" seniors who had worked hard throughout
their lives, Cartwright was unwilling to support a national pension system
because he believed this would discourage people from saving money for
their old age:
"My own impression is that, in a great many cases … a
[pension] scheme would be found to encourage extravagance, and the result
would be that the thrifty, industrious working man would find himself
compelled ultimately to bear the burden of his less industrious and
possibly dissolute companion." (Debates of the Senate of the
Dominion of Canada, 1906-1907. Third Session, Tenth Parliament,
Ottawa, 1907, p. 331.)
Cartwright argued that working people would put money aside if they
were encouraged to do so:
"…there is very little risk of any hardworking, industrious,
able bodied man not being able to make an adequate provision for his old
age, if only an opportunity were given to him." ( Ibid., p. 331.)
Donald Ferguson (1839-1909), from Marshfield, Prince
Edward Island, was a prominent Conservative Senator in 1907. He supported
much of the proposed Government Annuities bill because he felt
such a program would encourage foresight and saving,
although he argued it would appeal most to the middle class. Ferguson's
arguments reflect the growing awareness of the plight of the elderly poor
in this period. At the same time, he emphasized the government's
responsibility to help only those seniors worthy of support:
"Poorhouse conditions have been greatly improved since Dickens
wrote Oliver Twist, but no applied humanitarianism can remove in the minds
of many of the most deserving the strong sense of shame in being obliged
to accept that form of relief." (Ibid., p. 712.)
An annuity scheme would restore the dignity of such people and
encourage them to be careful with their money:
"There is nothing like holding out hope to the wage-earner and
giving him an absolute certainty that he will have some relief in old age.
It encourages thrift rather than otherwise." (Ibid., p. 713.)