abour's involvement in politics
coincided closely with the ups and downs of the union movement in the
pre-World War I years. Action in the political realm was divided
broadly between two perspectives. Independent labour parties,
associated closely with craft unionism and often created by local
labour councils, were scattered across the country. These parties
professed the ideals of labourism, an ideology that emphasized the
gradual reform of capitalism. Labourists argued for legislative
changes to better protect workers and to enhance their rights,
public ownership of basic utilities, and the eight-hour day. Greater
government regulation, they believed, would bring an end to what they
saw as unfettered capitalism.
On the other hand, socialist parties emerging in these years
called for a more fundamental transformation of capitalism. Some
socialists were Marxists who emphasized social class analysis in
their practice. Other socialists, often Christians, considered
themselves ethical socialists. The Socialist Party of Canada and the
Social Democratic Party of Canada were the two main socialist parties
of the time.
Neither the socialist nor the independent labour parties represented
a serious threat to the established political parties across the
country. Nevertheless, in civic politics labour did begin to establish
its political presence and occasionally elected a member to provincial
legislatures. Three labour candidates won seats in the House of
Commons: Arthur Puttee, Winnipeg; Ralph Smith, Vancouver; and Alphonse
Verville, Montreal. These men came from the most moderate ranks of
the independent labour party supporters, a fact demonstrated after
their elections by their move into the Liberal Party caucus.
Perhaps the most interesting development in the realm of labour
politics occurred just before the beginning of the war. Prior to
this, socialists and labourists, with their divergent ideologies,
had waged battles against one other. Socialists believed that a
direct attack on capitalism was needed to create a better world for
workers, while the labourists believed in more gradual reform. Now,
however, in many towns and cities across the country, they softened
their attitudes and began to co-operate on local issues. This pattern
of co-operation continued into the early years of the war and had
significant implications for labour's political
fortunes by 1916.
|